New Arrivals — Browse our catalog for the latest authentic Japanese sword arrivals. Browse →
* Image is for illustrative purposes only.Tamahagane, known as the material of the Japanese sword, is produced through tatara smelting using iron sand as its raw material. When discussing the jigane or hamon of a sword, the conversation tends to turn toward tanren and yaki-ire, but before all of that lies the starting point: what kind of iron sand to use. Here we organize, within what can be confirmed, the differences between the two types of iron sand commonly discussed: "masa iron sand" and "akome iron sand." For an overview of the entire process through to the production of tamahagane, the article Tamahagane and the Tatara Ironmaking Process is also helpful.
Masa iron sand and akome iron sand are distinguished by their titanium content (titanium dioxide, TiO2). The Nationwide Archaeological Site Report Archive of the Nara National Research Institute for Cultural Properties lists the bibliographic information of a research paper (Kubo Yoshihiro and Kubota Kunichika, Tatara Kenkyū, 2010) that takes this classification as its subject, with the role of ilmenite as its main theme. However, that page contains only the bibliographic entry and keywords, so the definitions and specific figures cannot be confirmed.
Zuku is cast iron with a high carbon content. Its properties differ from those of the steel that becomes sword material, and the key point of this classification is that which of the two is produced more readily in the same furnace depends on the properties of the iron sand.
The abstract of an experimental paper by Kubo Yoshihiro (Tetsu to Hagane, vol. 109, no. 1, 2023) presents the following results using iron sand from the Chūgoku region.
It should be noted that these are values for the iron sand used in the experiments, not standard content figures for akome or masa respectively. Nevertheless, it can be clearly read that titanium content affects the outcomes inside the furnace.
The same abstract states that the experimental results are consistent with historical accounts describing how pre-modern tatara operators added titanium-rich iron sand from specific sources to masa-type iron sand in order to obtain zuku. In other words, iron sand was not simply chosen for quality alone, but was also a material to be combined according to what was to be produced — steel or zuku.
Tamahagane, on the other hand, is understood to be the steel obtained from low-titanium masa-type iron sand. What is sought as sword material is steel with few impurities and consistent carbon content. For this reason, low-titanium iron sand has been valued on the raw-material side of sword making.
We also note here the points that could not be confirmed in this investigation.
Explanations that state these things definitively can be found, but as they are not supported by publicly available sources, we do not address them here.
The production of materials for contemporary Japanese swords is carried on in a limited number of settings, including the Nittoho tatara. The work of those who carry on this tradition is covered in Contemporary Tatara Ironmaking and Its Practitioners, and how tōkō select and split the finished tamahagane is covered in Selecting and Splitting Tamahagane.
When looking at a sword, remember that behind the beauty of the hamon and jigane lies the story of the material — the properties of the iron sand and the conditions of the furnace. Swords of interest can be browsed in the online catalog (sword listing).
← When the Registration Certificate Differs from the Actual Sword — Discrepancies in Length, Sori, Mekugi Holes, and Mei, and How to Think About Reporting
NextWhat Is "Kokon Kaji Bikō"? — An Edo-Period Sword Reference for Looking Up Tōkō Signatures and Wazamono Rankings →
Forging & Polishing
Forging & Polishing
Forging & PolishingHow to buy from Japan, sword laws by country, and how to read certification papers
Thinking about buying from Japan? →