New Arrivals — Browse our catalog for the latest authentic Japanese sword arrivals. Browse →
* Image is for illustrative purposes only.The term tameshiuchi (試し打ち) is commonly used to refer to tameshigiri (試し斬り)—testing the cutting ability of a completed sword using that finished blade. However, in the context of metalworking techniques, it can also denote "experimental striking" or "sample forging" conducted during production to verify the condition of the blade material. This article explains tameshiuchi in the latter sense—namely, as a mid-process checkpoint within the sword-making procedure.
The intermediate confirmations that a sword maker performs at each stage of forging can be classified into three major categories:
The comprehensive concept incorporating all of these is "tameshiuchi," and since defects discovered after completion are extremely difficult to repair, this process is an extremely critical stage that determines the success or failure of sword making.
When viewed by process stage, the confirmation items can be organized as follows:
| Process Stage | Main Items to Confirm at This Point |
|---|---|
| After folding and forging | Presence or absence of surface cracks (hadaware) |
| At the raw drawing-out stage | Uniformity of material thickness and unevenness in carbon distribution |
| After fire-shaping is complete | Shape check assuming provisional hardening (checking for warping) |
At the stage when folding and forging (orikaeshi tanren) has been performed several times, the sword maker carefully observes the surface of the steel. The main item to confirm at this point is the presence or absence of "surface cracks" (hadaware).
Surface cracks are minute fractures that occur during folding and forging in the following areas:
Small surface cracks may disappear through continued forging, but deep cracks persist despite repeated forging and ultimately remain as defects in the blade. Such defects are often only discovered after polishing, sometimes causing great disappointment to the sword maker.
One method of confirmation at this stage is "applying a light blow to observe how the crack spreads." The steel is reheated to an appropriate temperature, and the surface changes and presence or absence of delamination are observed when struck lightly with a hammer. If the crack spreads, it is determined that there is a problem with the material, and in some cases the decision is made to start over from scratch with new material. This entails significant cost, but it is far more rational than discovering defects after completion, and it is a moment when the sword maker's sincerity and judgment are put to the test.
Once the folding in forging is complete and the basic form of the blade is created in the "raw drawing-out" (sunobe) process, a different type of confirmation becomes necessary. The purpose of tameshiuchi at this stage is to confirm "uniformity of material thickness" and "unevenness in carbon distribution."
Uniformity of material thickness is confirmed by actually bending the blade lightly. If there are sections that have become too thin, those sections will deform first and can be visually confirmed. Additionally, changes in hammer feel (the difference between sections that feel soft and those that feel hard) can be used to judge unevenness in carbon distribution. Higher-carbon sections are relatively hard, while lower-carbon sections have a softer feel. Eliminating this difference in feel and achieving overall uniformity is the primary goal of the raw drawing-out stage, and an experienced sword maker continues a dialogue with the steel with each hammer strike.
At the stage when "fire-shaping" (hizukuri), which defines the external form of the blade, is complete, a final shape confirmation before hardening is performed. The "tameshiuchi" at this point can be recharacterized as "checking the shape as if assuming provisional hardening."
The sword maker simulates in advance how the blade will curve during hardening (warping will occur) and intentionally creates shallow warping (or warping in the opposite direction) at the point when fire-shaping is complete. To confirm whether this shape design—anticipating deformation after hardening—is correct, the sword maker sometimes performs provisional hardening on material with similar properties to measure the amount of deformation. This is sometimes called "trial hardening" (tameshiyaki).
The deformation data obtained from this trial hardening becomes the basis for fine-tuning the fire-shaping form before the actual hardening. An experienced sword maker has internalized this amount of deformation through vast forging experience, but when using new materials (such as tamahagane from a different lot), trial hardening is indispensable. This carefulness is what distinguishes a masterwork from an ordinary blade.
Trial striking during sword-making and "tameshimono" (試し物)—confirming the cutting ability of a completed sword—are fundamentally different. Tameshimono was an institutional custom of the Edo period in which the cutting ability was quantified using the bodies of executed criminals or straw bundles and water-filled bamboo, and the purpose was to "grade" cutting ability. The technique of "head-slicing officials" such as Yamano Kougou and Yamada Asarouemon was recorded in history as a specialized craft devoted to tameshimono.
In contrast, trial striking during sword-making aims at early detection of defects and quality assurance, and is a quality control activity embedded within the production process rather than an evaluation after completion. This concept corresponds to "in-process inspection" in modern manufacturing, and the sword-making practices of Japan offer an excellent example of how the seeds of modern quality control can be seen within traditional craftsman techniques.
Contemporary sword makers are limited by law to producing a maximum of 24 swords per year (the upper limit per certified sword maker as recognized by the Ministry of Culture), and the loss from a single failure represents approximately 4.2% of annual production. For this reason, the importance of intermediate confirmation remains unchanged in the modern era.
Many contemporary sword makers employ the practice of extracting sample pieces (cut-off scraps of steel) at each stage of folding and forging, polishing them, and visually confirming the ji-tetsu (ground steel) structure. By confirming the uniformity of the wood grain pattern (mokume, itame, or masame) that appears when the steel is polished, the quality of the forging can be evaluated. This is a quality control method that is a contemporary interpretation of traditional "tameshiuchi," and it serves as evidence that contemporary sword makers are practicing it while inheriting ancient wisdom.
Tameshiuchi is an act by which a craftsman questions their own work. "Is this steel uniform?" "Is this shape appropriate for hardening?" "Does this material have defects?"—the process of providing answers to these questions is tameshiuchi, and it is a moment when the sword maker's sincerity and technical skill are put to the test. Behind the beauty of the finished piece lies meticulous confirmation work performed over and over in unseen processes. When appreciating a Japanese sword, please imagine the strict culture of self-inspection that lies behind its creation.
← The Tegai School: Swordsmiths of Nara and the Art of Yamato Den
NextThe History of Tameshi-giri: The Ritualized Sword Testing System of the Edo Period →
Forging & Polishing
Forging & Polishing
Forging & PolishingHow to buy from Japan, sword laws by country, and how to read certification papers
Thinking about buying from Japan? →