Meiji Military Sword Era
明治軍刀期
From the Haitōrei (1876) through the end of the Meiji era, Japanese swords faced simultaneous existential crisis and modern redefinition. The attempt to reconcile Western military sabers with the native tradition, and the heroic struggle of individual smiths to preserve their craft, define this turbulent period.
Description
The Impact of the Haitōrei
On 28 March 1876 (Meiji 9), the Meiji government promulgated the Haitōrei (Sword Abolition Edict), which prohibited the carrying of swords except by those wearing full dress uniform and by military and police officers and the like. It was the moment when the Japanese sword, long called the soul of the samurai, was overnight banned from being carried in public places. The shock of this policy extended in many directions. Swordsmiths lost their principal market, and sword-related craftsmen, including koshirae makers, polishers, and silversmiths, were all forced out of business. Many swords were discarded or broken up and lost, their value as cultural property unrecognized.
Samurai who opposed the Haitōrei rose up that same year in the Shinpūren Rebellion (Kumamoto), the Akizuki Rebellion (Fukuoka), and the Hagi Rebellion (Yamaguchi). In the following year, 1877, these escalated into the Satsuma Rebellion (the rebellion of Satsuma samurai led by Saigō Takamori). Ironically, the Satsuma Rebellion was also the war in which the government army, equipped with modern weaponry, defeated Satsuma samurai who still carried old-style swords from before the Haitōrei, and it became a symbol of Meiji modernization.
The Survival of the Japanese Sword as the Guntō
The Haitōrei was not a total ban on carrying swords; military and police officers were permitted to wear them. This exception became the lifeline by which the Japanese sword survived into the modern era as the guntō. The Meiji government adopted Western-style military sabers (yōshiki guntō) as the official issue for the army and navy, but among officers the practice persisted of using traditional Japanese-style swords mounted in guntō-koshirae.
Guntō broadly came in two types: the hybrid Japanese-Western type, with a Japanese blade fitted into Western-style mountings and koshirae, and the saber type, which was entirely Western from blade to koshirae. The former worked to preserve the skills of Japanese swordsmiths, while the latter functioned as purely Western military equipment. From the mid-Meiji period onward, as the Japanese military's confidence grew through the First Sino-Japanese and Russo-Japanese Wars, the argument that 'the Japanese sword, uniquely Japanese, is the symbol of the military spirit' grew stronger, and a trend emerged toward returning to guntō with traditional blades.
Gassan Sadakazu and the Transmission of Traditional Techniques
The swordsmith who achieved the most emblematic success under the Haitōrei was Gassan Sadakazu (1836–1918). Sadakazu, who succeeded to the Gassan school of Osaka, continued to work as a swordsmith after the Haitōrei. His blades displayed superbly the distinctive forged surface known as ayasugi-hada, a Gassan school tradition resembling the grain of cedar wood, and embodied the continuity of traditional technique. In 1906 (Meiji 39), he was appointed an Imperial Household Artist (Teishitsu Gigei-in; artist attached to the Imperial Household), the highest official honor for a swordsmith. Sadakazu's example proved that, even under the Haitōrei, the skills of traditional swordsmiths could be protected and esteemed at the national level.
The Beginnings of the Sword Preservation Movement
In the turmoil following the Haitōrei, an awareness began to take root among some intellectuals and collectors that Japanese swords should be preserved as cultural property. Museums (including what later became the Tokyo Imperial Household Museum) began collecting and exhibiting swords, and the view of the sword as art spread among the educated classes. In 1897 (Meiji 30), the Ancient Shrines and Temples Preservation Law was enacted, and a legal framework was taking shape under which swords too would be subject to protection. This became the precursor of the later designation systems for 'Important Cultural Properties' and 'National Treasures,' and formed the foundation for sword preservation activities in the Shōwa period.
The Collectible Value of Meiji Guntō
Swords of the Meiji guntō period occupy a distinctive position in the collecting market. Judged purely as art swords, they rank below works from before the Edo period. Yet among specialist collectors they have a firm following, on account of their historical value as 'witnesses to modern Japanese history,' the contextual meaning of technical continuity under the Haitōrei, and the pure technical perfection of masterworks such as those by Gassan Sadakazu. In particular, works by Meiji-period Imperial Household Artists such as Gassan Sadakazu and Miyamoto Kanenori are highly regarded artistically.
Characteristics of This Era
- Devastation of the Haitōrei (1876): the loss of carrying rights nearly destroyed the sword industry, forcing most smiths and craftsmen out of work; the exception for military and police personnel became the sole lifeline for the tradition
- Survival as military sword: traditional Japanese blades housed in Western-style military fittings (guntō koshirae) became the primary form in which Japanese swords continued to exist within modern state institutions
- Emergence of Imperial Household Artists: smiths such as Gassan Sadakazu and Miyamoto Kanenori were appointed to the highest public honor available to craftsmen, demonstrating that the state could protect and valorize traditional craftsmanship even in the age of modernization
- Advancing 'art object' status: museum collections and exhibitions began, and the reframing of swords from weapons to Japanese art cultural heritage spread among the educated class
- Preservation of signature techniques (e.g., ayasugi-hada of the Gassan school) by individual masters — technical continuity in this era depended on personal devotion against the odds
- Early legal frameworks for cultural property protection: the Law for the Preservation of Ancient Shrines and Temples (1897) and related developments laid the groundwork for the NBTHK establishment and the postwar sword preservation movement