New Arrivals — Browse our catalog for the latest authentic Japanese sword arrivals. Browse →
* Image is for illustrative purposes only.The Nanbokuchō period (1336–1392) is called the "golden age of tōkō" in the history of the Japanese sword. The rapid surge in demand for weapons caused by large-scale civil war brought about rapid expansion of the kaji industry and technological innovation. This article analyzes tōkō management and the economic fluctuations of the forge during this era.
The Nanbokuchō upheaval lasted 56 years into the early Muromachi period. During this time, daimyo and shugo across the country required enormous numbers of swords.
Estimates suggest that several thousand to tens of thousands of swords were produced per year during these 56 years.
In response to increasing demand, the movement of tōkō became more active.
During the Nanbokuchō period, however, forges across the country converted to sword production in response to demand. Kaji craftsmen in Kyushu (Satsuma and Bungo), Etchū (Toyama Prefecture), and even Owari entered sword production one after another.
Daimyo sought to secure talented tōkō under exclusive arrangements.
The "selling of one's service" and transfers of individual tōkō also became common, and the conditions of compensation and status guarantees improved rapidly.
In order to meet the explosion in demand, the organization of the forge grew more complex.
The traditional arrangement was a small-scale setup of one to three master tōkō and three to five apprentices. During the Nanbokuchō period, specialized division-of-labor craftsmen were organized under a single master tōkō.
Thanks to this division of labor, annual production under the same master tōkō increased to five to ten times the previous level.
The supply of tamahagane required for sword production also increased rapidly.
In the Hii River basin of Shimane Prefecture (a major production center of tatara iron since ancient times), operations accelerated from the traditional two to three operations per year to a pace of one to two operations per month during the Nanbokuchō period.
As a result, the price of tamahagane rose moderately, and lead times for delivery to tōkō were shortened.
The economic status of tōkō improved dramatically.
In the traditional system (the Kamakura period), compensation for one sword consisted of several koku of rice and clothing. During the Nanbokuchō period, this changed as follows.
Tōkō came to be recognized as "daiku" (an elite profession commanding the same respect as architectural craftsmen). Some prominent tōkō, such as those of the Fukuoka Ichimonji School of Bizen, participated as senior retainers of daimyo in political consultations beyond sword production.
The increase in demand and compensation simultaneously brought about technological innovation.
The gonome-ba and midareba established by the late-Kamakura Sōshū-den (Masamune and others) spread widely and developed during the Nanbokuchō period. Gonome-ba has an alternating wavy pattern with a continuous, powerful appearance, while midareba was further developed by the Sōshū school as a complex and splendid hamon.
These combined practical value (durability and cutting performance) with aesthetic value, and were prized among daimyo and warriors.
Swords with regional character suited to local demand were developed in various areas.
When the Nanbokuchō were unified in 1392, the warfare came to an end. Demand for swords dropped rapidly, and tōkō faced a turning point.
However, the sword-making techniques and organizational know-how established during this period became the foundation for the subsequent development of sword-forging.
The warfare of the Nanbokuchō period brought about the "golden age" of the tōkō industry. The explosion in demand raised compensation and rapidly elevated the social status of tōkō. At the same time, organization, division of labor, and technological innovation accelerated. The hamon and styles that spread and developed during this period continue to be respected to this day as classics of Japanese sword aesthetics. The technological and economic legacy born from the negative phenomenon of warfare must be assessed in its proper historical perspective.
← Independence of Northern Kanto Swordsmiths After the Kyotoku War
NextRural Relocation of Contemporary Swordsmiths and the Rebuilding of Production Regions — The Reality Facing Tōkō Who Open Workshops in Depopulated Areas, and Their Contribution to Regional Revitalization →
History & Eras
History & Eras
History & ErasHow to buy from Japan, sword laws by country, and how to read certification papers
Thinking about buying from Japan? →