New Arrivals — Browse our catalog for the latest authentic Japanese sword arrivals. Browse →
* Image is for illustrative purposes only.The Nanboku-chō period (1336–1392) is called the "golden age of sword-smiths" in the history of Japanese swords. The sharp increase in weapon demand due to large-scale civil war brought about rapid expansion of the smithing industry and technological innovation. This paper analyzes sword-smith management and economic fluctuations of smithing workshops during this era.
The Nanboku-chō upheaval lasted 56 years into the early Muromachi period. During this time, daimyo and military governors throughout the land required vast quantities of swords and blades.
Estimates suggest that tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of swords were manufactured annually over these 56 years.
In response to increased demand, the migration of sword-smiths became more active.
However, during the Nanboku-chō period, smithing workshops throughout the nation converted to sword manufacturing in response to demand. Smithing craftsmen from Kyushu (Satsuma and Bungo), Etchu (Toyama Prefecture), and furthermore from Owari entered sword manufacture in succession.
Daimyo sought to secure prominent sword-smiths.
Individual sword-smiths' self-sale and transfers became common, and conditions for compensation and status assurance rapidly improved.
To respond to the explosion in demand, the organization of smithing workshops became more complex.
Previously, workshops were organized on a small scale with 1–3 master sword-smiths and 3–5 apprentices. During the Nanboku-chō period, specialist craftsmen were organized under one master sword-smith.
Through this division of labor, annual production under the same master sword-smith increased to 5–10 times the previous level.
Supply of tamahagane necessary for sword manufacture also increased rapidly.
In the Hii River basin of Shimane Prefecture (the ancient principal production site of tatara iron), operations accelerated from 2–3 operations per year to 1–2 operations per month during the Nanboku-chō period.
As a result, tamahagane prices rose gradually, and delivery lead times to sword-smiths were shortened.
The economic status of sword-smiths improved dramatically.
Previously (Kamakura period), compensation for one sword was several koku of rice and clothing. During the Nanboku-chō period, it changed as follows.
Sword-smiths came to be recognized as elite craftspeople on par with respected master carpenters. Some renowned sword-smiths (such as Bizen's Fukuoka Ichimonji school) participated in political consultation with daimyo as senior retainers, beyond sword manufacture.
The increase in demand and compensation simultaneously brought about technological innovation.
The gonomel hamon and midareba established by the Soshu tradition (such as Masamune) in the late Kamakura period became widely disseminated and developed during the Nanboku-chō period. The gonomel hamon features alternating waves in a continuous, powerful appearance, while the midareba is a complex and elegant blade pattern that the Soshu school further developed.
These combined practical utility (durability and cutting performance) with aesthetic value, and were treasured among daimyo and warriors.
Swords with regional characteristics suited to local demand were developed in various areas.
When the Nanboku-chō was unified in 1392, warfare ended. Sword and blade demand declined rapidly, and sword-smiths faced a turning point.
However, the sword-manufacturing techniques and organizational knowledge established during this period became the foundation for the subsequent development of sword-smithing.
The warfare of the Nanboku-chō period brought about a "golden age" of the sword-smith industry. The explosion in demand improved compensation, and the social status of sword-smiths rose sharply. Simultaneously, organization, division of labor, and technological innovation were accelerated. The blade patterns and styles that became widespread and developed during this period are respected today as classics of subsequent sword-blade aesthetics. It is necessary to evaluate historically the technical and economic legacy born from the negative phenomenon of warfare.
← Independence of Northern Kanto Swordsmiths After the Kyotoku War
NextRural Migration of Modern Swordsmiths and Regional Revival: The Reality of Swordsmiths Opening Workshops in Depopulated Areas and Their Contribution to Regional Revitalization →
History & Eras
History & Eras
History & ErasHow to buy from Japan, sword laws by country, and how to read certification papers
Thinking about buying from Japan? →